Austin Peay
Men - Women
2012 - 2013 - 2014
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
1,649  Martin Rejman FR 34:45
1,998  Daniel Hamm FR 35:19
2,271  Hunter Guthrie FR 35:52
2,530  Kyle Harmon FR 36:28
2,832  Alex Haycraft FR 37:39
2,877  Nathan Sparks FR 37:50
2,977  Cory Nwaiji SO 38:34
2,991  Tyler Kepley SR 38:42
3,082  Thomas Owen SO 39:34
National Rank #255 of 311
South Region Rank #26 of 41
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 26th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 0.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Martin Rejman Daniel Hamm Hunter Guthrie Kyle Harmon Alex Haycraft Nathan Sparks Cory Nwaiji Tyler Kepley Thomas Owen
Greater Louisville Classic (Blue) 10/05 1371 34:17 34:56 35:59 37:36 37:03 37:58 38:38 37:27 39:35
Ohio Valley Championship 11/02 1389 35:00 35:19 35:28 36:25 38:22 38:44 40:27
South Region Championships 11/15 1370 34:53 35:45 36:10 35:46 37:04 38:32





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 25.9 827 0.0 4.1 10.1 22.1 34.2 19.0 7.2 2.5 0.5 0.1



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Martin Rejman 123.7
Daniel Hamm 145.6
Hunter Guthrie 161.9
Kyle Harmon 179.2
Alex Haycraft 211.3
Nathan Sparks 216.3
Cory Nwaiji 228.2




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 0.0% 0.0 22
23 4.1% 4.1 23
24 10.1% 10.1 24
25 22.1% 22.1 25
26 34.2% 34.2 26
27 19.0% 19.0 27
28 7.2% 7.2 28
29 2.5% 2.5 29
30 0.5% 0.5 30
31 0.1% 0.1 31
32 0.0% 0.0 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0